 |
Agile State of the Art -
November 2010
Survey Results
|
 |
| |
|
|
 |
This survey was performed during the month of October and
early November 2010 and there was
180 respondents. The survey
was announced in on several agile mailing lists, on my
Twitter feed,
and on the Agile Alliance forum on LinkedIn.
|
|
Some findings include:
- Figure 1 depicts the amount of agile experience
on 'agile teams'
- Experienced agile teams:
- 66% provided an initial estimate/budget
- 67% (of the 66%) evolved their initial estimate
- 20% of teams did either evolutionary or staged-gate funding without an
initial estimate at first
- Had an average iteration length of 2.3 weeks, as depicted in
Figure 2
- Took an average of 4.6 weeks to run through a transition/release phase
to move their solution into production, as depicted in
Figure 3
- Released ever 11.4 weeks on average
- Inexperienced agile teams:
- 72% provided an initial estimate/budget
- 62% (of the 72%) evolved their initial estimate
- 12% of teams did either evolutionary or staged-gate funding without an
initial estimate at first
- Had an average iteration length of 2.6 weeks
- Took an average of 6.0 weeks to run through a transition/release phase
- Released ever 13.8 weeks on average
Figure 1. Amount of experience with agile on "agile
teams".

Figure 2. Iteration lengths for experienced agile
teams.

Figure 3. Amount of time experienced agile teams
invested in releasing/transitioning their solution into production.

You may use this data
as you see fit, but may not sell it in whole or in part.
You may publish summaries of the findings, but if you do
so you must reference the survey accordingly (include
the name and the URL to this page). Feel free to
contact me
with questions. Better yet, if you publish,
please let me know so I can link to your work.
- People didn't know the purpose of the survey, so that likely removed
some bias.
- This survey suffers from the
fundamental challenges faced by all surveys.
Links to Other Articles/Surveys
- My other surveys
Why Share This Much Information?
I'm sharing the results, and in particular the source data, of my surveys for
several reasons:
- Other people can do a much better job of analysis than I can. If
they publish online, I am more than happy to include links to their
articles/papers.
- Too many traditionalists out there like to use the "where's
the proof" question as an excuse not to adopt agile techniques. By
providing some evidence that a wide range of organizations seem to be
adopting these techniques maybe we can get them to rethink things a bit.
- I think that it's a good thing to do and I invite others to do the same.

